Opinions, questions and thoughts on server virtualization - from Tony Asaro, Chief Strategy Officer at Virtual Iron.
Tony Asaro
Citrix - "Shifting" Focus

Charles Babcock, writer for Information Week, reporting from Citrix Synergy Event in Houston – wrote: “Citrix Systems is changing its emphasis on virtualization. From now on, it's less about launching virtual machines in the data center and more about delivering virtual services to user desktops.” Here is the link to the full article:

"Citrix Shifts Virtualization Spotlight To Desktops" - http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/server_virtualization/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=207801153&cid=RSSfeed_IWK_News

This is a very compelling statement that requires further analysis.

- Delivering services to user desktops leveraging virtualization has always been important to Citrix and one of the main reasons they acquired XenSource. So what is the "shift"?

- I think the sentence: "it's less about launching virtual machines in the data center..." provides the answer. The implications are pretty strong that the "shift" is server virtualization isn't a core focus for Citrix going foward. And you really can't be "less" about supporting server virtualization. It is either something you do or don't do.

- This shift isn't really a suprise to us and to some industry experts. Gartner's Tim Bittman said in March 2008: “Citrix acquired XenSource to expand into the Virtual Desktop Infrastructure market (where client VMs are hosted on servers) and to compete in the server virtualization market. The former seems like a rich opportunity for Citrix. The latter will be an uphill battle...”

- We don't really run into Citrix in competitive situations at end user customers or the channel. From our perspective they aren't in the server virtualization business where it counts -in the field.

- This is the smart move for Citrix. Being a major player in server virtualization was never in the cards for them. For one thing, Citrix is missing the equivalent of VMware Virtual Center and Virtual Iron’s Virtualization Manager – which is requisite for true server virtualization. Additionally, their whole business model is around desktop solutions and leveraging this is the right thing for them to do.

- Another factor that must be considered in the Citrix “shift” is Microsoft and the MS Hyper-V solution. Does Citrix really want to compete head-to-head with their biggest strategic partner?

Citrix probably won't agree and will deny that they are "shifting" away from server virtualization. But keep your eyes open. I predict that their actions going forward will fortify my analysis.

del.icio.us | digg | StumbleUpon | reddit | Slashdot
Posted by Tony A. on May 22, 2008 11:58 AM | Permalink | Comments (1)

← True Server Virtualization | Virtual Iron and VDI →

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.virtualiron.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1670

Comments (1)

Matt:

Hi Tony

Re your "shifting" post...Citrix has spent 20 years "dancing underneath the feet of the elephant" and are in that position once again.

Matt

Post a comment
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)



RSS/XML Feed Add to Bloglines Add to My Yahoo! Add to Google
Make Sure Your Head is in the Clouds
Virtualization Training and Education
VMware Pricing - Virtually Sky High
Free ESXi is Just Pie in the Sky
Microsoft Hyper-V - Nothing and Everything Changes
Simon Says Something Scary
Virtual Iron and VDI
Citrix - "Shifting" Focus
True Server Virtualization
VMware Memory Overcommit = FUD
ARCHIVES
Customer Spotlight -
Tim Walsh
Virtual Infrastructure -
Chris Barclay
ZDNet's Virtually Speaking
Alessandro Perilli's Virtualization.info
Tarry Singh's Virtualization for Everyone
David Marshall's VMblog
Mark Bowker -Liquefying IT
Fraser Campbell's Linux Virtualization
Chris Wolf's Virtualization Tips and Ramblings
Scott Lowe's Blog
Virtualization Daily
Thomas Bittman
Gartner