Virtual Discourse

Opinions, questions and thoughts on server virtualization - from Tony Asaro, Chief Strategy Officer at Virtual Iron.

Tony Asaro

Free ESXi is Just Pie in the Sky

Now that the dust has settled on VMware providing a free hypervisor - I feel its a good time for me to kick it up again. It isn't necessarily VMware's fault that when they announce something that everyone makes a big deal about it. But there really is no big deal with free ESXi and it doesn't change the economics of server virtualization.

First point - VMware is late in providing a free hypervisor - as my colleague Chris Barclay pointed out in his recent blog - "ESXi Free at Last?" Chris also reminds people that Virtual Iron has been providing a free hypervisor since 2006.

Second point - if you want to implement VMware with multiple physical servers and utilize Virtual Center - you still pay what you always paid. The list price for managing a 4-socket VMware environment is still nearly $20,000. I think Scott Lowe, an industry expert and blogger, hit the nail right on the head in his blog:

"... you have to remember that VMware is only releasing ESXi for free. They’re not releasing VirtualCenter for free. You’ll still need VirtualCenter and VI3 Enterprise licenses in order to do stuff like VMotion, Storage VMotion, VMware DRS, VMware HA, VMware DPM, etc. Just like Microsoft, whose System Center Virtual Machine Manager and the rest of the System Center suite will be “paid-for” products, VMware will continue to charge for VirtualCenter."

The news here is that there really is no news. Its not a bad thing that there is a free ESXi out there but it doesn't fundamentally change the economics of server virtualization. It is important for Virtual Iron to make this clear to any customers or channel partners that might get confused by all of the hype. Free ESXi is no big thang. Just keep doing what you are doing.

del.icio.us | digg | StumbleUpon | reddit | Slashdot

Posted by Tony A. on August 28, 2008 12:43 PM | Permalink | Comments (2)

← Microsoft Hyper-V - Nothing and Everything Changes | VMware Pricing - Virtually Sky High →

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.virtualiron.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1684

Comments (2)

Hal Rottenberg:

While nothing you said is untrue, I think you do a small disservice to the SMB shops out there who were not in the position to purchase VirtualCenter in the first place (nor System Center). For these businesses, free ESXi can be very significant. A company a friend works for had been previously using a series of VMware Server hosts. He recently replaced them with ESXi and was able to double his VM capacity due to performance increases seen with the superior product.

How does that compare to other free hypervisors? I don't know. Are there any good benchmark studies out there?

Posted by Hal Rottenberg | September 5, 2008 3:13 PM

Posted on September 5, 2008 15:13

Tony Asaro:

Hal,

Of course I disagree that I am doing a disservice to SMB companies. I am not saying ESXi doesn't have any value. However, the media jumped on free ESXi as something that was somehow going to change the economics of server virtualization and that is incorrect.

I contend that Virtual Iron is a far more cost effective solution once you need to go beyond a free hypervisor and need to manage the the virtual infrastructure. In a 4-socket environment running Virtual Center and VI3 it is still going to cost a customer nearly $20,000 for VMware and with Virtual Iron it is around $3,800. So who is actually doing a disservice to the SMB?

Posted by Tony Asaro | September 8, 2008 5:31 PM

Posted on September 8, 2008 17:31