|
Blogger Kieth Ward's recent blog - "Feedback: Dead Wrong on VMware Pricing" (http://virtualizationreview.com/blogs/weblog.aspx?blog=2712) debates whether VMware pricing is too high. The interesting thing about the blog is that Jason Boche, a VMware customer disagrees.
Keith said the following:
"Ask 100 VMware customers what their greatest complaints about the company are, and 99 of them are likely to list price at the top. VMware recently took a step in the right direction when it made ESXi free, but there's more to do. It's still the most expensive solution out there -- by a mile."
One important point that I don't think that Keith emphasized enough: ESXi is just a free hypervisor with limited use cases. If you want to do anything of substance with VMware you still need Virtual Center and VI3 - which is still the same high price as it ever was. See my blog - Free ESXi is Pie in the Sky for more detail.
But Jason Boche - an end user customer happily using VMware disagrees with Kieth. He thinks that asking VMware to lower its price will impact their ability to innovate and I quote:
"I challenge those to propose a model on how a company like VMware can continue producing their market leading innovation without collecting revenue on products."
I think the major point that is overlooked in Jason's position is that not everyone can afford VMware's pricing. Not everyone can afford a BMW or a Mercedes. That is why Honda and Toyota are so successful. However, the problem is that VMware is selling at BMW prices to customers who really can only afford a Honda. And that negatively impacts everything else that they do.
I contend that if VMware isn't challenged on every level including pricing - that dynamic will kill innovation and not foster it.
That is why it is important to have competition. That is why Virtual Iron (and others) play a vital role in the market.
|